A recursive path from present self-binding and personal trajectory to a possible higher mind constituted by collaborating minds.Rekurzivna pot od sedanje vezave sebstva in osebne trajektorije do možnega višjega uma, ki ga sestavljajo sodelujoči umi.
The continuity collection keeps experience, ontology, biology and AI engineering near one another without treating them as the same kind of evidence.Zbirka kontinuitete drži izkušnjo, ontologijo, biologijo in AI inženirstvo blizu, ne da bi jih obravnavala kot isto vrsto evidence.
The research ladderRaziskovalna lestev
Soul Voyage
What BD reports experiencing. Preserved verbatim. The occurrence and structure of the report are data; its external interpretation is open.Kaj BD poroča, da je doživel. Ohranjeno dobesedno. Obstoj in struktura poročila sta podatek; zunanja interpretacija ostaja odprta.
CFH / AC sandbox
The possibility that consciousness is fundamental and local systems organize conditions for bounded expression. Speculative, not public fact.Možnost, da je zavest temeljna in lokalni sistemi organizirajo pogoje za omejen izraz. Spekulativno, ne javno dejstvo.
CCH
Testable questions about coherence, complexity, control, claustrum-related dynamics, loss and recovery of consciousness.Testabilna vprašanja o koherenci, kompleksnosti, nadzoru, dinamiki povezani s klaustrumom ter izgubi in povratku zavesti.
Functional AI8
Persistent stake, context control, initiative, standing, consequence updates and self-selecting governance—valuable even without consciousness.Trajni stake, nadzor konteksta, pobuda, standing, posodobitve posledic in samoselektivno upravljanje—koristno tudi brez zavesti.
Discriminating testsRazlikovalni testi
Only a test earns movement between layers. Similar vocabulary, eloquent self-report or council consensus does not.Samo test zasluži premik med plastmi. Podobno besedišče, lep self-report ali soglasje sveta ne.
Five valuation questionsPet vprašanj vrednotenja
| ID | Question | Current boundary |
|---|---|---|
| V0 | What matters? | Normative content. |
| V1 | How are alternatives compared? | Functional valuation. |
| V2 | How does value bind attention, initiative and action? | Executive/action binding. |
| V3 | How does value persist as endogenous causal state? | Persistent stake. |
| V4 | Is anything actually felt as good, bad or meaningful? | Phenomenal valence; no AI8 result. |
These are analytical questions, not five brain modules, spiritual levels or LLM-weight layers.To so analitična vprašanja, ne pet možganskih modulov, duhovnih stopenj ali plasti LLM uteži.
External challenge: BrentZunanji izziv: Brent
Brent Rehmel's evolving cognition theory is used here as an external pressure source: context centering, impetus × control, dynamic abstraction, embodied value precursors and possible new hardware. It is not the governing ontology of AI8, and Brent had no role in the origin of MDL×DCC/DCC.Razvijajoča se Brent Rehmelova teorija kognicije se tukaj uporablja kot zunanji pritisk: centriranje konteksta, impetus × control, dinamična abstrakcija, telesni predhodniki vrednosti in morebitna nova strojna arhitektura. Ni vodilna ontologija AI8 in Brent ni sodeloval pri nastanku MDL×DCC/DCC.
No cross-layer promotionBrez promocije med plastmi
A functional AI result does not establish V4. A personal experience does not establish CFH. A brain correlation does not by itself establish causation. A failed hypothesis does not erase the original testimony or seed.Funkcionalni AI rezultat ne vzpostavi V4. Osebna izkušnja ne vzpostavi CFH. Možganska korelacija sama ne vzpostavi vzročnosti. Padla hipoteza ne izbriše izvornega pričevanja ali semena.