LJUBLJANA · PROMET · REFERENDUM · 2026LJUBLJANA · TRAFFIC · REFERENDUM · 2026

Ljubljanski prometni referendum: napačno orodje ali nujna zavora?Ljubljana traffic referendum: wrong tool or necessary brake?

Referendum o parkiranju v soseskah je majhen lokalni primer velikega problema: kdaj naj ljudje odločajo neposredno in kdaj mora stroka najprej pokazati modele, podatke in poskusno obdobje.A referendum about neighborhood parking is a local example of a bigger problem: when should people decide directly, and when must experts first show models, data, and a trial period?

12.7.2026

datum glasovanjavote date

227k

volilnih upravičenceveligible voters

257

voliščpolling stations

4. člen

jedro sporacore dispute

RHP princip te strani: najprej več možnih razlag, potem kill-testi, potem najmanjši popravek sistema, ki ga je mogoče meriti.RHP principle of this page: explore several explanations first, then apply kill-tests, then ship the smallest measurable system correction.

Zakaj je to pomembno?Why this matters

To ni strankarski članek. To je poskus, da se aktualno temo razstavi na mehanizem: kaj se je zgodilo, kje je tveganje, kaj bi merili in katera varovalka bi bila boljša od navijaškega kričanja.This is not a partisan article. It is an attempt to unpack the mechanism: what happened, where the risk is, what should be measured, and which safeguard is better than tribal shouting.

Hitro kazaloQuick map

01DEJSTVOKaj je referendum?What is the referendum?02PROBLEMZakaj je to slab format?Why is this a weak format?03KOMPROMISKaj bi bilo bolje?What would be better?04TESTKako meriti parkiranje?How to measure parking?05REZULTATModel za občineA model for municipalities

KARTICA 01 · URADNO

MOL + GOV.SI

Naknadni referendum o 4. členu prometnega odlokaSubsequent referendum on Article 4 of the traffic ordinance

Glasuje se o parkiranju v soseskahThe vote is about neighborhood parking

Majhno vprašanje, velik demokratični signal.A small question with a large democratic signal.

MOL je razpisal naknadni referendum o 4. členu odloka, ki uvaja ureditev parkiranja v območjih sosesk. Glasovanje je napovedano za 12. julij 2026.The Municipality of Ljubljana called a subsequent referendum on Article 4 of the ordinance, introducing parking regulation in neighborhood zones. The vote is scheduled for 12 July 2026.

Po uradni strani MOL je bilo na dan 11. 6. 2026 navedenih 227.376 volilnih upravičencev in 257 volišč. To ni poceni pogovor. To je velika mestna operacija.According to the official MOL page, on 11 June 2026 there were 227,376 eligible voters and 257 polling stations. This is not a cheap conversation. It is a major municipal operation.

Zato je legitimno vprašanje: ali je referendum najboljše orodje za parkirni režim ali pa znak, da javna razprava pred sprejemom ni bila dovolj prepričljiva?So the legitimate question is: is a referendum the best tool for a parking regime, or a sign that the public debate before adoption was not convincing enough?

227.376upravičenceveligible voters

257voliščpolling stations

12.7.referendumreferendum

KARTICA 02 · BD TEST

REFERENDUM

Ljudje niso prometni simulatorPeople are not a traffic simulator

Referendum je groba zavoraA referendum is a rough brake

Včasih je nujen. Pogosto pa rešuje napako prepozno.Sometimes it is necessary. Often it corrects the process too late.

Pri prometu ima vsak močno osebno izkušnjo: stanovalec, dnevni migrant, obrtnik, dostavljavec, starš, starejša oseba, invalid, kolesar. Zato je tema politično eksplozivna.Traffic policy touches everyone: residents, commuters, craftsmen, delivery workers, parents, older people, disabled people, cyclists. That is why the topic is politically explosive.

Ampak prav zaradi tega referendum pogosto postane glasovanje o jezi, zaupanju v župana ali splošnem odnosu do mestne politike, ne pa natančna odločitev o prometnem modelu.But because of that, a referendum often becomes a vote on anger, trust in the mayor, or general city politics, not a precise decision on the traffic model.

za referendumfor referendum

ko oblast spremeni vsakodnevno življenje brez dovolj posluha in brez prepričljive razlage.when authority changes daily life without enough listening or convincing explanation.

proti referendumuagainst referendum

ko bi bilo bolj smiselno najprej pokazati podatke, variante in pilotni režim.when it would be more sensible to first show data, alternatives, and a pilot regime.

KARTICA 03 · RHP MODEL

MOST

Ne “za/proti”, ampak A/B/C modeliNot yes/no, but A/B/C models

Bolje: prometni laboratorijBetter: a traffic laboratory

Mesto naj ne zahteva vere. Naj pokaže test.The city should not demand faith. It should show a test.

PREDLOGPROPOSAL 01

Model A: status quoModel A: status quo

Kaj se zgodi, če ničesar ne spremenimo: zasedenost, kroženje za parkirnim mestom, pritiski na stanovalce.What happens if nothing changes: occupancy, circling for parking, pressure on residents.

PREDLOGPROPOSAL 02

Model B: mestni odlokModel B: city ordinance

Kaj prinese sprejeti 4. člen: komu izboljša življenje, komu poslabša, koliko stane izvedba.What Article 4 brings: who benefits, who loses, how much implementation costs.

PREDLOGPROPOSAL 03

Model C: pilotna conaModel C: pilot zone

Najprej 3–6 mesecev v izbranih soseskah, z merjenjem in možnostjo popravka pred širšo uvedbo.First 3–6 months in selected neighborhoods, with measurement and correction before broader rollout.

KARTICA 04 · MERITVE

KPI

Promet se ne meri z občutkiTraffic is not measured by vibes

Kaj bi morali pokazati pred glasovanjem?What should be shown before voting?

Volivec mora videti posledice, ne samo političnega letaka.A voter should see consequences, not only a campaign leaflet.

BD test:BD test: Če občina ne zna pokazati simulacije, zemljevida učinkov in pilotnega plana, prosi ljudi za slepo zaupanje.If a municipality cannot show a simulation, impact map, and pilot plan, it is asking people for blind trust.

zasedenostpred/pobefore/after

časiskanja mestasearch time

dostopnostinvalidi/starejšiaccessibility

strošekuvedbe in nadzoraimplementation and enforcement cost

KARTICA 05 · PREDLOG

OBČINSKI STANDARD

Referendum šele po strokovni razgrnitviReferendum only after expert disclosure

Mestni standard za sporne odlokeMunicipal standard for contested ordinances

Vsaka občina bi morala imeti javni predreferendumski paket.Every municipality should have a public pre-referendum package.

Pred referendumom bi morala obstajati obvezna stran z vsemi modeli: besedilo odloka, zemljevid območij, pričakovani učinki, stroški, alternative, mnenja strokovnjakov in pripombe prebivalcev.Before a referendum, there should be a mandatory page with all models: ordinance text, area maps, expected effects, costs, alternatives, expert opinions, and resident objections.

Tako referendum ne bi bil samo “da/ne” po občutku, ampak zadnja demokratična varovalka po tem, ko so bile možnosti resno razložene.Then the referendum would not be only a gut-level yes/no, but the final democratic safeguard after the options were seriously explained.

Rezultat: referendum ostane možnost, vendar šele po javnem prometnem modelu in pilotski logiki.Result: referendum remains possible, but only after a public traffic model and pilot logic.

ViriSources

Viri so navedeni kot factual anchors, ne kot avtomatsko strinjanje z interpretacijami.Sources are factual anchors, not automatic agreement with interpretations.

S1 · GOV.SI

Naknadni referendum v Mestni občini Ljubljana

Uradna objava datuma referenduma in predmeta 4. člena odloka.Official notice of referendum date and Article 4 subject.

S2 · MOL

Naknadni referendum o prometnem odloku

Referendumsko vprašanje, 227.376 volilnih upravičencev in 257 volišč.Referendum question, 227,376 eligible voters and 257 polling stations.

S3 · ParkinLj

Štepanjsko parkiranje in referendum

Civilni/stanovanjski pogled na ureditev parkiranja in referendum.Resident/civic view of parking regulation and referendum.